I really want to like AMC’s
newest show Preacher. It’s from the
minds of Seth Rogen and Evan Goldberg and executive produced by Breaking Bad’s Sam Catlin. Hearing Seth
Rogen discuss the comic book the show is based upon along with the litany of
smart people behind the scenes, Preacher
should be a masterpiece. Two episodes in, the show might be, but I just can’t
tell yet. I have no idea if I like this show or not. After an hour-and-a-half
premiere and an hour long second episode, I have a good idea of who these
characters are and what their intentions are. The problem I am having is that I
don’t have an emotional investment in any of them. Preacher so far has gone for style over substance, which it turns
has made for a frustrating television watching experience.
The show is extremely confident
and knows exactly the story it wants to tell and how to tell it. Rogen and
Goldberg have been around television and movie making long enough that it would
have been a disappointment if the show didn’t come out guns blazing. Set in
rural, Friday Night Lights – esque Texas, the show feels like a science fiction
Western. It has the looks and feel of a Western that just so happens to have
aliens and vampires. The cinematography is gorgeous and perfectly lit and feels
like a visual representation of a gritty and dark comic book.
Further, it’s characters are
fully formed. It helps that Rogen and crew have pages of source material to
determine what these characters should be and how they should act (and act with
each other). Preacher throws you
directly into its world like it’s the alien force jumping into Father Jesse Custer.
I appreciate Preacher not holding the audience hands and spoon-feeding us information. There’s no John Williams score telling me how to feel. But at the same time, the opposite approach that Preacher is taking isn’t working either. Standing across the room shouting at us what’s going on also isn’t effective. There’s a fine line between assuming the audience is smart enough to handle complex information and detail, and just straight up ignoring the audience. Preacher seems to be doing the latter. Let me rephrase that, it seems to be ignoring the audience of those who haven’t read the comic books. Those who know where this story is going seem to be enjoying it far more than a non-comic book reader like myself. That’s because they can both appreciate the visual aspect of the show while also being able to shade in the characterizations and seemingly random scenes in for themselves. However, as I lack the information to shade, I just find things confusing more than anything.
That’s not to say that Preacher won’t begin shading and won’t
begin doing it soon. I might be singing a different tune by this time next
week, and I hope to be singing a different one by season’s end. A lot of Preacher and its take on characters
reminds me of the second season of The
Leftovers. Outside of a jarring flashback to cavemen times, the second
season thrust you into a brand new location (Miracle, Texas versus upstate New
York) following an entirely new set of characters (the Murphys) with only a
cameo from our lead Kevin Garvey. As someone who was a fan of the first season
of The Leftovers, everything that was
new was associated with being bad and frustrating and thus I didn’t like it.
However, by season’s end, I grew to love everything that was the show’s second
season. I am confident the same will happen to me by the season’s end of Preacher.
WHAT ARE YOUR THOUGHTS ON PREACHER SO FAR? LET US KNOW ON OUR FACEBOOK PAGE!
________________________________
If you would like to comment on this post, please visit our Facebook page